Legal Opinion

Bell v. Gray

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 9, 1960No. 5:05-misc-00015PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

The statement of plaintiffs’ counsel in his brief that this is a court of general jurisdiction should be corrected. Every federal court is a court of limited, not of general, jurisdiction. All presumptions are against the jurisdiction of such a court, so that the facts disclosing the jurisdiction must affirmatively appear upon the record. Turner v. Bank of North America, 1799, 4 Dall. 8, 1 L.Ed. 718; McNally v. Jackson, D.C., 7 F.2d 373; Swanson v. United States, 9 Cir., 224 F.2d 795, 15 Alaska 608.

The motion to dismiss the complaint should be sustained.

The complaint…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
  2. Kavanagh v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Chicago Golf ClubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  4. Zula Swanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Sidbury v. GillDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hugh D. Blanchard and Cullen Jenkins, D/B/A Blanchard & Jenkins Construction Company v. Terry & Wright, Inc. And Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. Evans-Hailey Company v. Crane CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
  3. Blanchard v. Terry & Wright, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1963
  4. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
  5. Knights of Pythias Hall Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API