Bell v. Gray
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
SWINFORD, District Judge.
The statement of plaintiffs’ counsel in his brief that this is a court of general jurisdiction should be corrected. Every federal court is a court of limited, not of general, jurisdiction. All presumptions are against the jurisdiction of such a court, so that the facts disclosing the jurisdiction must affirmatively appear upon the record. Turner v. Bank of North America, 1799, 4 Dall. 8, 1 L.Ed. 718; McNally v. Jackson, D.C., 7 F.2d 373; Swanson v. United States, 9 Cir., 224 F.2d 795, 15 Alaska 608.
The motion to dismiss the complaint should be sustained.
The complaint…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
- Kavanagh v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Chicago Golf ClubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Zula Swanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Sidbury v. GillDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hugh D. Blanchard and Cullen Jenkins, D/B/A Blanchard & Jenkins Construction Company v. Terry & Wright, Inc. And Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Evans-Hailey Company v. Crane CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
- Blanchard v. Terry & Wright, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1963
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
- Knights of Pythias Hall Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.