Legal Opinion

Ristine v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1895No. 17,312PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

In this case there was a special finding of facts and conclusions of law staged by the court. The only error assigned calls in question the conclusions of law. The facts, so far as necessary to the determination, of the questions presented, are as follows:

Appellant’s ward is, and has been since 1887, a person of unsound mind. His real estate was sold at the tax sales in 1888, 1890 and 1891. Tax deeds were made to the purchasers at the sales of 1888 and 1890. This action was commenced in May, 1892, and tried February, 1893. The only question presented is whether interest is to be computed on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schissel v. DicksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Macy v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Figgins v. FigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Wagner v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Williams v. HedrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API