Foley v. Bitter
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeals from the Superior Court of Baltimore City, in Equity. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.
These appeals have been argued together and may all be disposed of in one opinion. They present the question of the *649validity of the deed of trust for the benefit of creditors, executed by Augustus Johnson and William Behr, co-partners, to Eugene Cummiskey, Esquire, on the 29th day of June, 1865.
The bill of complaint was filed by Deidrick Bitter and Daniel Solomon, who were each creditors of Johnson and Behr, and who sued as well for themselves as for all other creditors who might come in and contribute to the expenses of the suit; charging that “the deed was made, executed, delivered and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brooks v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Klapp's Assignees v. ShirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Bank v. Prager & SonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- Ferrall v. FarnenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Main v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Luckemeyer v. SeltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.