Legal Opinion

Michael Demirdjian v. William Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2016No. 09-56453PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dissent by Judge NOONAN

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Michael Demirdjian appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. In 2001, he was convicted of murdering two teenage boys with intent to inflict torture; he was 15 years old at the time of the crimes. During closing argument, the prosecution repeatedly commented on the defense’s failure to explain key incriminating evidence or use competent evidence to support its exculpatory theories. Instead of objecting, defense counsel rebutted the comments by giving non-incriminating explanations of the evidence and reminding the jury the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Howard Atkins v. Georgia CrowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Willbanks v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. State v. NathanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  4. Wade Robertson v. Rise PichonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. (HC) Caldwell v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API