Legal Opinion

Monical v. Nofziger

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 30, 2021No. 6:18-cv-02214Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION BRADLEY W. MONICAL, Plaintiff, Case No. 6:18-cv-02214-YY v. OPINION AND ORDER JEREMY NOFZIGER and CRAIG PRINS, Defendants. YOU, Magistrate Judge: Pro se plaintiff Bradley Monical (“Monical”), an adult in custody (“AIC”) at the Oregon Department of Corrections (“ODOC”), brings this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

suit, alleging that defendants subjected him to a constitutionally deficient disciplinary process. Plaintiff originally commenced this action against various defendants; only defendants Jeremy Nofziger and Craig Prins (“defendants”)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.