Legal Opinion

Fuston v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 2, 2007No. 2006-CA-000299-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANMETER, Judge.

Richard Fuston appeals pro se from the Whitley Circuit Court’s order denying his motion for relief pursuant to RCr 2 11.42 without an evidentiary hearing. Fuston alleges several instances of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part.

In January 2002, Fuston was convicted by a jury of first-degree manslaughter. On direct appeal, a panel of this court set out the facts as follows: 3

In 2001, Richard Fuston and a number of other members of his family lived in the Mount Morgan Apartment complex in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. David Ronald Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Harper v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brian Edmonds v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  2. Willard E. Calhoun v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API