Legal Opinion

Loudon v. Robertson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1840PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Shelby Cireuit Court. The defendants in error were the plaintiffs in the Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Debt on a writing obligatory. The defendants pleaded two pleas. 1. Payment. 2. Actio non as to 169 dollars and ,28 cents, part of the debt demanded, because the writing obligatory in tlie declaration mentioned, was given in consideration of the purchase of a tract of land lying in Shelby county, which was sold by the plaintiffs as commissioners appointed by the Probate Court of said county to sell the real estate of one George Titus, deceased; that, at the time of the sale, there were seven heirs of the said George him surviving, of whom James Titus was onej; that at the March term, 1834, of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newman v. SylvesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Burns v. GavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Halleck v. GuyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Beeson v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Rocksell v. AllenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1844

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API