Legal Opinion

Bennett v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2001No. 99-CF-177, 99-CF-220PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

A jury found appellant (Bennett) guilty of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, assaulting a police officer, unlawful entry, and two counts of failure to appear for trial. His primary argument on appeal is that the trial court erroneously refused to permit him to cross-examine a key corroborative government witness, Jerome Lucas, with efforts Lucas had made to bribe or kidnap a witness in a case in which Lucas had been charged with (and ultimately pled guilty to) murder. We hold that the trial court — in part misled by representations of the prosecutor as to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Longus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. MacKabee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. McCloud v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Powell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API