Legal Opinion
Gillioz v. Webb
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1938No. 8861PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appellants are contractor and surety on a Government contract for the construc tion of Barrack Building No. 3 at Fort Benning, Georgia. Appellees are persons who, having furnished labor in the prosecution of the work provided for in the contract, intervened under the Heard Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270, to recover the additional wages due them under Article 20(a) of the contract. This article provided:(a) The -rate of wage for all laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor or any subcontractor on the public building covered by this contract shall be not less than the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Goltra v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Sweeney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Ohio Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Ybanez v. Anchor Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Kelly v. GrimshawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- United States v. General Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.