Fredenheim v. Rohr
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from au order of the chancery court of city of Richmond, entered May 15th, 1889, and an order of the judge of that court entered May 21st, 1889, in a chancery cause wherein Nathan Rohr and others, creditors of M. S. Fredenheim, are complainants, and M. S. Fredenheim and others, are defendants.
Read the full summary
Appeal from au order of the chancery court of city of Richmond, entered May 15th, 1889, and an order of the judge of that court entered May 21st, 1889, in a chancery cause wherein Nathan Rohr and others, creditors of M. S. Fredenheim, are complainants, and M. S. Fredenheim and others, are defendants. The object of the suit was to annul, on account of fraud, a deed of trust executed by said M. S. Fredenheim April 27th, 1889, to Herman Rosenberg, trustee, and to enjoin the former and her husband and the said trustee from disposing of the trust effects, and to have a receiver appointed to take…
1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.
The bill charges that Margaret S. Fredenheim, being indebted to the complainants, with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud them and her other creditors, on the 27th of April, 1889, made a deed of conveyance of all her stock in trade to one H. Rosenberg, which deed was duly recorded in the clerk’s office of the chancery court of the city of Richmond, and an official copy thereof is filed as an exhibit with the bill.
The prayer of the bill, after calling for answers from the defendants, is, that “ the said H. Rosenberg, trustee as aforesaid, Margaret S. Fredenheim, and A. Fredenheim, her…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Triebert v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Voshell v. HynsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
3Cited by4 opinions
- Va., Tenn. & Car. Steel & Iron Co. v. WilderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892
- Baltimore Bargain House v. St. ClairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Pyeatt v. Prudential Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Wilder v. KelleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1891