Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Donacam Associates
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
The principal question presented in this case is whether a determination by appellant WSSC to levy special benefit assessments against appellees Donacam Associates, Inc., et al. (hereinafter Donacam) involved a “contested case” as defined by Code, Art. 41, § 244(d) and was, therefore, appealable by Donacam to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County under § 255. The parties have also argued, as they did below, the legality of the special assessments in question. *722We do not reach that issue since we conclude that the proceeding before the WSSC was not a “contested case.” Therefore,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Albert v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Ulman v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weiner v. Maryland Insurance AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Reese v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Wash. Sub. San. Com'n v. Donacam Assoc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984