Legal Opinion

Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Donacam Associates

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1984No. 470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The principal question presented in this case is whether a determination by appellant WSSC to levy special benefit assessments against appellees Donacam Associates, Inc., et al. (hereinafter Donacam) involved a “contested case” as defined by Code, Art. 41, § 244(d) and was, therefore, appealable by Donacam to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County under § 255. The parties have also argued, as they did below, the legality of the special assessments in question. *722We do not reach that issue since we conclude that the proceeding before the WSSC was not a “contested case.” Therefore,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Albert v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Ulman v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weiner v. Maryland Insurance AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Reese v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Wash. Sub. San. Com'n v. Donacam Assoc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API