Legal Opinion
MENTER v. Astrue
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 12, 2008No. Civil Action 05-CV-5653 (DMC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Tyrone Menter’s (“Plaintiff’) application for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), § 204(a), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2000). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78, no oral argument was heard. After carefully considering the submissions of the parties, and based upon the following, it is the finding of this Court that Plaintiffs application for attorney’s fees is granted in part and denied in part.
I.Background 1
Plaintiff filed an application for Supplemental Security Income on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Patterson Ex Rel. Chaney v. ApfelDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Bunn v. BowenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Ashton v. PierceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bilak v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- LEVYASH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- LEWIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Moyer v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- TORRES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020