Legal Opinion

Hobart Corp. v. SIEGLE EX REL. HOERBER

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 1992No. 90-2595, 90-1208PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

600 So.2d 503 (1992)

HOBART CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellant,

v.

Allan T. SIEGLE, a minor, by and through his legal guardian Mary E. HOERBER, and Steven Siegle and Bettye Siegle, individually, Appellees.

Nos. 90-2595, 90-1208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 9, 1992.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, and Stuart Eilers, Cleveland, Ohio, Blackwell & Walker, and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellant.

Perse & Ginsberg, and Edward Perse and Lawrence Rodgers, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.

SUBSTITUTED OPINION

2Per curiam

We deny Hobart Corporation's motion for…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Goldschmidt v. HolmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. AUBURN MACH. WORKS, CO., INC. v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Sims v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Lasar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. BachanovDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jennings v. BIC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. LEGGETT GROUP, INC. v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Pinchinat v. Graco Children's Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
  4. Gibbs v. Republic Tobacco, L.P.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
  5. Farias v. MR. HEATER, INC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API