Legal Opinion
Behm v. Saeli
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 10, 1990No. 89-508PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
560 So.2d 431 (1990)
Charles H.H. BEHM, et ux., et al., Appellants,
v.
Amadeo B. SAELI, et ux., et al., Appellees.
No. 89-508.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 10, 1990.
Louis Ossinsky, Jr. of Ossinsky, Krol and Hess, Daytona Beach, for appellants.
A.M. Crabtree, Jr., P.A., Satsuma, for appellees.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION
GOSHORN, Judge.
We deny the appellees' motion for rehearing but grant the motion for clarification of the opinion filed February 8, 1990. The original opinion is hereby withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its stead:
Appellants…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Procacci v. ZaccoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Robertia v. Pine Tree Water Control Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by14 opinions
- Heigert v. Londell Manor, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- American Quick Sign, Inc. v. ReinhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Friends of the Black Forest Regional Park, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Shanak v. City of WaupacaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Camino Sin Pasada Neighborhood Ass'n v. RockstrohNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.