Carl & Tobey Co. v. Beal & Fletcher Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Hempstead Circuit Court. Rufus D. Hearn, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. This was an action by attachment brought by Beál & Fletcher Grocer Company against W. L. Page and Mary C. Baldwin, partners doing business under the firm name of W. L. Page & Co. The writ of attachment was levied upon a stock of goods in the possession of the Carl & Tobey Company, which stock of goods had been purchased from the defendants, W. L. Page & Co. The defendants, Page & Co:, did not…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Hempstead Circuit Court. Rufus D. Hearn, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. This was an action by attachment brought by Beál & Fletcher Grocer Company against W. L. Page and Mary C. Baldwin, partners doing business under the firm name of W. L. Page & Co. The writ of attachment was levied upon a stock of goods in the possession of the Carl & Tobey Company, which stock of goods had been purchased from the defendants, W. L. Page & Co. The defendants, Page & Co:, did not dispute plaintiff’s debt, but filed an affidavit controverting the grounds of the attachment. The Carl & Tobey Company…
1Opinion of the Court
Riddick, J.,
(after stating the facts.) This is a controversy concerning the ownership of a stock of goods. The goods were owned by W. L. Page & Co., who sold them to the appellant, the Carl & Tobey Company. The appellee, the Beal & Fletcher Grocer Company, afterwards attached the goods to satisfy a debt held by them against said W. L. Page & Co., and said appellee contends that the sale to the appellant was fraudulent and void. The question to be determined is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the finding of the circuit court to the effect that the sale was made by Page & Co. with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Levy & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Oppenheimer v. M. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
- Hart v. SandyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Carter Bros. & Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Harris v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M. Rosenheim & Son v. Flanders SistersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Collin County National Bank v. Laser Grain Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Sly v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Maddox v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Lee v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923