Legal Opinion

Suburban Construction Co. v. Naugle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 15, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Specific Performance and Injunction—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Circuit Court granting an injunction.

Appellees, as contractors, had undertaken by their agreement of Hovember 28, 1896, to construct, equip for operation by electricity, and to operate for the period of two years, a certain system of railroad known as the Suburban Eailroad Company. By the same agreement the Suburban Construction Company, one of appellants, undertook to pay appellees for such construction, services, etc., in stocks and bonds of the railroad to be constructed. Certificates of the stock were to be issued and delivered to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Railway Co. v. AllingSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Franklin Telegraph Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pacific Etc. Ry. Co. v. Campbell-JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Board of Trade v. RiordanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Parish v. VanceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  4. Goldberg v. LaughlinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Ebann v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API