Charles S. Riley & Co. v. Carter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from Rountree, J., at September Term, 1913, of PeNder.
1Opinion of the CourtOlaRK, C. J.
As to assignments of error 1 and 9, the Pere-goy Company was a lumber plant operating mueh machinery, and under article 23 of the deed of trust the plant was required to be maintained and kept in operation. On foreclosure under article 4, a sale being made, all the estate of the company was to vest in the purchaser, “whether said trustee be in possession thereof or not, and whether the same be now owned or shall be hereafter acquired.” Article 9 vests in the trustee all the legal and equitable rights to all property then owned by the company, “and all property and rights of any kind whatever…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . VoightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Wilson v. Western North Carolina Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Bernhardt v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Purifoy v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Bond v. BeverlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Town of Dunn v. TewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Cox v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Purifoy v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Blalock v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.