Legal Opinion

Purifoy v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This was a civil action, tried before Philips, J., and a jury, at Spring Term, 1890, of Mecklenburg Superior Court. Appeal by the plaintiff. The facts sufficiently appear in the' opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

Acts Special Session 1868, ch. 8, incorporated the A.-L. Railroad of South Carolina, and authorized it “to construct, equip and operate its road within the limits of this State from any point on the South Carolina line to such point on the C. & S.. C. Railroad or the N. O. Railroad at Charlotte as shall be found most practicable” and gave the company “ all the rights, powers and privileges conferred on the C. & S. C. Railroad by ch. 84, Acts 1846-7.” Sections *10225 and 27 of this last act give the corporation a right-of-way of 100 feet on each side of the center of the road-bed,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carolina Central Railroad v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Carolina Central Railroad v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. County of Los Angeles v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Nelson v. Atlanta Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Collier v. Union Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Board of Bond Trustees of Special Road & Bridge District No. 1Supreme Court of Florida · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API