Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Little

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill is filed to foreclose a mortgage from Little to the complainant, for $3249.33, bearing date on the twenty-first of November, 1859. The mortgage covers three tracts; one, a timber lot of thirty-nine acres; another, known as the saw mill tract, of one acre and forty-three hundredths; and the third, a farm of one hundred and sixty-five acres and thirty-six hundredths. The first two lots were of comparatively small value. The value of the farm was $9000. It was subject to three prior mortgages, amounting to $3870.34. On the fourth of November, 1861, the equity of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. GE CAPITAL MORTG. SERV., INC. v. MarilaoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Ryker v. Current (In Re Ryker)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
  3. West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. JacobsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API