Legal Opinion

West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. Jacobs

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 13, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By this bill complainant seeks to set aside a judicial sale of its lands had pursuant to a judgment at law in favor of the defendant. The original bill was based upon the allegations that the complainant's lands were not subject to sale on execution, and gross inadequacy of the selling price. On the defendant's motion to strike the bill, the late Vice-Chancellor Bentley held, shortly before his death, in an opinion reported in 105 N.J. Eq. 579, that the bill could not be maintained and should be dismissed. Thereafter, by order of the chancellor, the complainant was permitted to amend his bill…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spear v. Locust Wood Cemetery Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
  2. Hoffman v. GodfreySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Kloepping v. StellmacherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1871
  4. Cummins v. LittleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1863
  5. Howell v. HesterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1843

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C. D. Building Corp. v. GriffithesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. GE CAPITAL MORTG. SERV., INC. v. MarilaoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  3. COMMUNITY BANK OF BERGEN COUNTY, NJ VS. DORAN HOLDING COMPANY (F-033518-15, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  4. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ETC. VS. CHRISTOPHER COLE (F-021053-14, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API