Clausen v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL
QUILLEN, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
At what point, if any, does an insured’s bad faith action against his insurer permit the insured access to the insurer’s claims file and to other materials relevant to the bad faith claim but to which the insurer asserts both the attorney-client privilege and the work product privilege? This is the core of the parties’ dispute in the present Motion to Compel, which concerns discovery requests propounded by Plaintiff Lawrence W. Clausen (“Clausen”) and objected to by Defendant National Grange Mutual Insurance Company (“National…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Patel v. United Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Guzman-Rosario v. Charlie's Waste Services, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
- STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE v. MaddenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.