Legal Opinion

United States v. Borge

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided March 4, 2008No. 05-61566-CIVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CLAIMANT GUSTAVO BORGE’S MOTION TO INTERVENE

JAMES I. COHN, District Court.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Claimant Gustavo Borge’s Motion to Intervene [DE 91]. The Court has considered the Motion, the Government’s Response [DE 93], Borge’s Reply [DE 96], Borge’s Proposed Answer and Affirmative Defenses [DE 96-2], the Government’s Surreply [DE 99], and the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

In this Motion, Mr. Borge seeks to intervene in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), which provides as follows:

Intervention of Right. Upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Lawton Chiles, Jr., Bob Martinez, Metropolitan Dade County, Intervenors-Appellants v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. In re Healthsouth Corp. Insurance LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hofmann v. EMI RESORTS, INC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API