Deere & Co. v. Hesston Corp.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WOODWARD, District Judge.
The above-entitled cause having come on for trial and the Court having duly considered the evidence, and being fully advised in the premises, the Court now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This is an action charging infringement by defendants of Claims 15, 16, 18 and 19 of plaintiff’s U. S. Patent No. 3,397,522, entitled “Cotton Harvester,” in which defendants have filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment holding that said claims are invalid.
2. Plaintiff Deere & Company is a Delaware corporation having its principal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Edward Valves, Inc., and Rockwell Manufacturing Company v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Louis W. Parker, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Motorola, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Deere & Company v. Hesston Corporation, Hesston of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Deere & Company v. Hesston Corporation, Hesston of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971