Aikins v. Nevada Placer, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There must be something in a complaint to show the character of the claim made by the defendants, so that the court may determine from the face of the complaint whether the claim is a cloud on the title or whether it is merely a claim of no consequence. McLeod v. Lloyd, 71 P. 598.
In a suit to remove a cloud on title, it must be shown in the bill that such a cloud exists before relief can be given against it, and in such a case the bill must, in addition to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Harter v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Golden Fleece G. & S. M. Co. v. Cable Consolidated G. & S. M. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1877
- Scorpion Silver Mining Co. v. MarsanoNevada Supreme Court · 1875
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Casey v. LupkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Anderson v. BlixtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Kendall v. SouthwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Anderson v. LyonsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Hodges Transportation, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.