State v. Veliz

FILE·,., IN CLERKS OFFICI • IUPR!'!ME COURT, STATE OF ~II«J'RRt DATE MAR 0120\3. I -~~ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 85860-8 v. ) ) En Bane JOSE R. VELIZ, JR., ) ) Petitioner. ) Filed MAR 072013 ) WIGGINS, J.-ln this case we must decide whether a domestic violence protection order that includes a child visitation provision qualifies as a "court-ordered · parenting plan," a necessary element under a specific provision of Washington's first degree custodial interference statute, RCW 9A.40.060(2). We conclude that it does not because…