Legal Opinion

Buel, Pryor & Daniel v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 11, 1916No. 5422PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from County Court, Okmulgee County; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge. Action by Buel, Pryor & Daniel against the St. Louis & San Francisco Raiiway Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFORD, C.

This was an action brought for an alleged negligent delay in the transportation of certain cattle from iShulter, Okla., to National Stockyards, 111. The defendant pleaded a live stock shipping contract in the usual form used in interstate Shipments, and on the trial introduced in evidence a schedule governing the operation of its freight trains and the shipment of live stock in less than ten carload lots, between Shulter and National Stockyards, 111. The court instructed the jury as follows:

“You are instructed that the railroad company is vested with discretion as to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Hamilton, Sheriff v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Westlake v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Thompson v. HashbargerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Bounds v. GoochSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Dickinson v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Phelps v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API