Legal Opinion
Jocar Realty Co. v. Rukavina
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 6, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William Thom, J.
In this summary holdover proceeding, the issue has arisen of whether petitioner in an action involving an interim multiple dwelling must, as a necessary element in its prima facie case, plead and prove that there is on file with the New York City Loft Board a registration statement for the building which was in effect at the time the action was brought.
Petitioner is the owner of a building conceded by all parties to be an interim multiple dwelling under Multiple Dwelling Law article 7-C. Respondent is a residential tenant in this building pursuant to a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mandel v. PitkowskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
- Rosgro Realty Co. v. BraynenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972
- Feierstein v. MoserNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Kaufman v. American Electrofax Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People ex rel. Upchurch v. GittlesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vidod Realty Co. v. CalvinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989
- Cobra Resources, Inc. v. Dumpl, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987