Legal Opinion
Copeland-Jackson v. Oslin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 29, 2008No. Civil Action 08-00558 (ESH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff David Copeland-Jackson has filed a pro se complaint in this Court alleging defamation, negligence, false light, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against defendants, an Ohio newspaper and its reporter, based on the publication of three articles (the “Articles”) in the Ashland-Times Gazette in which plaintiff is referred to as a pedophile. 1 Defendants Irv Oslin and Dix Communications (“defendants”) have filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). For the reasons…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Van Rooy v. Anb 623 LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026