Legal Opinion

Haley v. Astrue

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 5, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1724 (JDB)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Haley brings this employment discrimination action against the Social Security Administration (“Administration”), Michael Astrue in his official capacity as Commissioner, and three human resource staff members, also in their official capacities. Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer venue. Upon consideration of defendants’ motion, the parties’ memoranda, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court grants defendants’ motion and transfers this action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Darby v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  5. Artis v. GreenspanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ananiev v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Fam v. Bank of America NA (USA)District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Wilson v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Slaby v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. McLaughlin v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API