CCL, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to the court’s bid-protest jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1491(b)(1) (West Supp.1997). The computer maintenance services at issue here were, until the end of September 1997, being performed by the protestor CCL at a Denver facility under a contract with the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA).1 They are now being performed by BDM International2 as a result of a modification of a separate contract. BDM acquired its work without competition and CCL contends that this violated the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA)3 and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Ramcor Services Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Cybertech Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.