Legal Opinion

The Sao Vicente

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 13, 1922No. 279-283PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

The above entitled causes are here on writs of cer-tiorari, issued upon the sole petition of George S. Duarte, who described himself therein as the duly accredited Consul General of the Republic of Portugal in the United States of America, without more. The petition sets out the proceedings below; declares, “The Portuguese Government does not intend to avoid its just obligations to citizens of the United States, but it claims that if there is any question between it and such citizens they are matters for ádjudication by the Diplomatic Departments of the two Governments and it does object to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. In Re BaizSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. The PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. The AnneSupreme Court of the United States · 1818

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Victory Transport Incorporated, Owner of the S.S. Hudson v. Comisaria General De Abastecimientos Y Transportes, Voyage Charterer of thes.s. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. Aquamar S.A. v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API