Legal Opinion

Hogle v. H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Mary Hogle against the H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Company. Verdict for plaintiff. Motion by defendant for .a new trial under Code Civ. Proc. § 999.

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

The plaintiff has obtained a verdict for $2,500 as damages for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the defendant by its servant or servants. The defendant now moves for a new trial on the minutes, pursuant to section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff is a married woman, the wife of John G. Hogle, and they occupy a house on Geddes street, in the city of Syracuse; the lease running to the husband, from a Mr. James Doheny, the owner of the property. The lot on which the house stands is 32x100 feet. At the rear and adjoining, the defendant owns…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Swords v. . EdgarNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Cosgrove v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. McCarthy v. TimminsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API