Legal Opinion
Aronson v. Dog Eat Dog Films, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 18, 2010No. C10-5293 KLSPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF LIKENESS AND INVASION OF PRIVACY
KAREN L. STROMBOM, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Dog Eat Dog Films, Inc’s. 1 special motion to strike Plaintiff Ken Aronson’s state law claims for invasion of privacy and misappropriation of likeness pursuant to the Washington Act Limiting Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (Washington Anti-SLAPP Act) 2 . Dkt. 15. The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- City of Longview v. WallinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Phoenix Trading, Inc. v. Loops LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Fielder v. Sterling Park Homeowners Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.