Legal Opinion
Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided June 24, 2002No. EP-99-CA0320-GTEPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EISELE, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Plaintiff State of Texas’ Motion for Summary Judgment and also the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The respective parties have filed responses and replies to both motions, and, on August 22, 2001, the Court took up the motions at a hearing in open court. Finally the Court permitted the parties to file post oral argument supplemental memoranda. Both parties took advantage of the opportunity by filing their respective supplements on August 31, 2001. The Court concludes that there are no genuine issues of fact and that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- TTEA v. Ysleta Del Sur PuebloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hardy v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- State of Texas v. Ysleta del Sur PuebloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.