State ex rel. McMichael v. Fox
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.
We are asked to determine if the State satisfied its duty as guardian ad litem of a child in a paternity action under the Uniform Parentage Act (UPA), RCW 26.26, where the man found to be the father had sexual intercourse with the mother near the time of the *348child’s conception, resembled the child, and had a blood/ genetic test indicating a 99.41 percent likelihood of a match; however, another possible father was not located, joined in the action, or subjected to a blood/genetic test.
Where there is overwhelming evidence of paternity, including blood/genetic test results, testimony from the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MeachamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SantosWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SpeedWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Marriage of AkonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Ragin v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State on Behalf of McMichael v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Calcaterra v. ManfraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- George Chapman v. Patricia ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018