Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McMichael v. Fox

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1997No. 64324-5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

We are asked to determine if the State satisfied its duty as guardian ad litem of a child in a paternity action under the Uniform Parentage Act (UPA), RCW 26.26, where the man found to be the father had sexual intercourse with the mother near the time of the *348child’s conception, resembled the child, and had a blood/ genetic test indicating a 99.41 percent likelihood of a match; however, another possible father was not located, joined in the action, or subjected to a blood/genetic test.

Where there is overwhelming evidence of paternity, including blood/genetic test results, testimony from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MeachamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. SantosWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. SpeedWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of AkonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. Ragin v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. State on Behalf of McMichael v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Calcaterra v. ManfraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. George Chapman v. Patricia ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API