Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. Sarvis

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 31, 1974No. 71-1503, 71-2019Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBazelon, Chief Judge

Defendants Leonard and Sarvis were charged with having participated in a particularly brutal crime — the robbery, torture and murder of Benjamin Rudd. At the conclusion of their joint trial, the jury found both defendants guilty of armed robbery and second-degree burglary. Sarvis was acquitted of the murder counts; Leonard was convicted of first-degree murder. A third defendant, one Francis Salters, tried together with Leonard and Sarvis on all counts except that charging first-degree murder, was acquitted.

I join the Court’s decision to reverse the defendants’ convictions. I agree that the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API