Legal Opinion

Roane v. Ross

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892No. 3141PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GAISES, Associate Justice.

—The appellee brought this suit to recover upon a promissory note executed by the appellant, and to enforce a lien upon a tract of land for which the no.te was given. He alleged in his petition that he was the holder of the note by virtue of an indorsement by the payees. The note matured January 1, 1884, and the suit was not brought until August 22, 1891; but it was alleged in the petition that after its maturity the defendant renewed his liability by signing a writing upon the back thereof, which is as follows:

“San Felipe, Texas, Oct. 27, ’87.
“I hereby renew the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. Paschal's AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bothwell v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Crider v. San Antonio Real Estate, Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Martin v. Land Mortgage BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Fuller v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1976
  5. Stone v. PettusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API