Lewis v. Paschal's Administrator
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. George H. Noonan. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.
This suit was brought on the following instrument of writing:—
“ Five years after date, I promise to pay to the order of Hat. “ Lewis, three thousand two hundred and seventy-seven dol- “ lars and twenty-nine cents, for value received, negotiable and “ payable without defalcation or discount, with interest at the “ rate of ten per cent, per annum, payable annually from date.” This note was dated San Antonio, April 9th, 1857, and signed I. A. Paschal. After the death of the maker, the note, duly authenticated, was presented to the administrator and allowed, and was approved as a legal claim…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Crider v. San Antonio Real Estate, Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Vermont Loan & Trust Co. v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Martin v. Land Mortgage BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Roane v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Stone v. PettusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.