Legal Opinion

In re Feinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Each applicant — one the corporate creature of a local bar association, the other a labor union — seeks our approval to function as a legal assistance corporation (Judiciary Law, § 495, subd. 5; 22 NYCBB Part 608, Buies of the Appellate Division) by furnishing prepaid legal services. The two proposed plans differ in several details, none pertinent to our consideration of the applications. The union’s application is recent; the other has been before us for some time, consideration *441thereof delayed because of proposed legislation on the subject then pending in the Legislature. The Legislature…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  2. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re ConnorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. In re Group Legal Benefit Plan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API