Legal Opinion

Goldstine v. FedEx Freight, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 11, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01164Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 DAVID GOLDSTINE, CASE NO. C18-1164 MJP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING RULE 50 AND RULE 59 POST-TRIAL MOTIONS 12 v. AND CONCLUDING PLAINTIFF’S ADA RETALIATION CLAIM IS 13 FEDEX FREIGHT INC, MOOT 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of 17 Law and Equitable Relief (Dkt. No. 358) and Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of 18 Law, or in the Alternative, a New Trial or Remittitur (Dkt. No. 350). Having reviewed the 19 Motions, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Pacific Radiation Oncology v. the Queen's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API