Commonwealth v. Grandone
Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions
1Opinion of the Court
Hargest, P. J.,
The defendant in this ease was charged with practicing medicine and surgery; holding himself forth as a practitioner in medicine and surgery; assuming the title of doctor of medicine and surgery, and diagnosing and treating diseases by the use of medicine and surgery without a license, contrary to the provisions of section 1 of the Act of June 3, 1911, P. L. 639. The evidence showed that the defendant was practicing a system known as chiropractic or chiropractice. Upon his conviction he made a motion for a new trial.
The reasons assigned for a new trial, from 1 to 8, inclusive,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Cathcart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Sikorski v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Commonwealth v. CateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Commonwealth v. SeibertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.