Legal Opinion

Ferluckaj v. Goldman Sachs & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rolando T. Acosta, J.), entered March 20, 2007, which, upon reargument, granted the motion of defendant Goldman Sachs (Goldman) for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing plaintiffs Labor Law § 240 (1) claim as against it, and granted third-party defendant American Building Maintenance Co.’s motion to dismiss *360Goldman’s third-party claim against it for indemnification, modified, on the law, to deny Goldman summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) claim as against it, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Tonking v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Broggy v. Rockefeller Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Bart v. Universal PicturesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bautista v. David Frankel Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Ferluckaj v. Goldman Sachs & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API