Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Aetna Life Insurance v. Schively

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1912No. 10318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application filed in the supreme court April IS, 1912, for a writ of mandamus to the insurance commissioner, directing him to issue a license to a foreign insurance company.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The Aetna Life Insurance Company is a stock insurance company, organized under the laws of the state of Connecticut. For some years past, it had been transacting a life, accident, and liability insurance business within the state of Washington, under licenses or certificates of authority issued to it by the state insurance commissioner. *504The last of these licenses expired on April 1, 1912, and thereupon the company applied to the insurance commissioner for a renewal thereof. The commissioner, while willing to grant it a license to do a life insurance business, or a license to do a liability…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Reed v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State ex rel. North Coast Fire Insurance v. SchivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Scouten v. City of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Leach v. FishbackWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API