Legal Opinion

State ex rel. North Coast Fire Insurance v. Schively

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1912No. 10205PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court February 21, 1912, for a writ of mandamus to the state insurance commissioner.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an original application on the relation of the North Coast Fire Insurance Company, a domestic corporation, for a writ of mandamus to compel the insurance commissioner to issue to it a license to make both fire and plate glass insurance. The respondent has demurred to the petition on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction of the proceeding and has also made his return to the alternative writ.

The respondent contends that, under the holding of this court in State ex rel. Stearns v. Smith, 6 Wash. 496, 33 Pac. 974, the demurrer should be sustained. In that case it was stated to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WomackWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Cowles v. SchivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Stearns v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lemon v. LanglieWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Dunbar v. State Board of EqualizationWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Pacific Bridge Co. v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Davis-Kaser Co. v. Colonial Fire Underwriters InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API