State v. Sartori
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Black Hawk District Court. The defendant was indicted for a nuisance; the charge being that at his drug store, ip the city of Cedar Falls, he kept for sale, and sold, certain intoxicating liquors contrary to law. ’ A trial was had, and the defendant was found guilty, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
1. criminal intoxicating1 tent?IS* m The defendant held a permit from the board of supervisors, to sell intoxicating liquors for the purposes authorized by law. The evidence shows that the defendant, by himself and his clerk, sold intoxieating liquors which were used as a beverage. The question as to whether the defendant was imposed upon, and deceived by the purchasers, and made to believe that the liquors sold were for the purposes authorized by law, was fairly submitted and, we think, properly decided under the evidence.
It is urged that as the owning and keeping with intent to sell in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Peterson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Bowers v. MaasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Rizer v. TapperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907