Legal Opinion

Nickey v. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1933No. 30067PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The state, on the relation of the attorney general, filed its bill in the chancery court of Tunica county against appellants, to recover of them the sum of seven thousand four hundred eighty-three dollars and twenty-two cents, the aggregate of the taxes and drainage district assessments due by appellants to the state, the county of Tunica, and the latter's taxing districts, the Yazoo-Mississippi levee district, and the Brunswick extension, and the Lake Cormorant drainage district, and the fees and damages incurred as a result of the advertisement by the tax collector of the county of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Delta & Pine Land Co. v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Carrier Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Quitman CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Enochs v. State ex rel. RobersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nickey v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State Tax Commission v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State v. RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Waits v. Black Bayou Drainage Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Vanzandt v. Town of BraxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API