Legal Opinion
Anthony v. Kozer
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 18, 1926No. 8784PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLYERTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs herein, of whom there are a number, are owners and operators of motor vehicles within the state of Oregon, and are users of the public highways within the state, including the rural post roads. The defendant is secretary of state of the state of Oregon, and is. authorized and required to receive from dealers in motor vehicles fuel statements of account for the sale of such fuel to users, and to collect from them the license tax provided by law to be paid by them, upon the amount of sales made thereof.
It is charged that the license tax provided for by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Clark v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Pierce Oil Corp. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martine v. KozerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1926
- Sanger v. LukensDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1927
- Arneson v. DennyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
- Brass v. The State of Nevada ex rel The NDOCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Duquette v. 1987 Centurion Barefoot Warrior Style Ski BoatDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.