Legal Opinion

City & County of Sacramento v. Bird

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Sixth District. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

Baldwin, J. concurring.

This case comes up on an agreed statement. The suit is brought to recover of the defendant a sum. of money in his hands, claimed to belong to the plaintiff, and which the defendant received from the State Treasury, as a compensation allowed by the general law to the Treasurers of the counties, for paying money in their hands into the State Treasury. It is claimed by the plaintiff that this sum, under the twenty-eighth section of the Act to incorporate the city and county of Sacramento, (Acts of 1858, 277) belongs to the corporation.

We think the plaintiff entitled to…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gonzalez v. PalmesSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  2. Culver v. Third National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. State v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Ex Parte OldenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Strickland v. GeideOregon Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API