Legal Opinion

Cronin v. Town of Tewksbury

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 14, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

The plaintiffs request declaratory and injunctive relief under G. L. c. 231A (1986 ed.) and G. L. c. 40, § 53 (1986 ed.). The plaintiffs seek to prevent the town of Tewksbury from expending $310,000 which was appro priated under Warrant Article 33 of the annual town meeting (Article 33) on May 5, 1986. The appropriation was “to be used to execute a contract in the name and in behalf of the Town to provide and administer private school transportation.” The plaintiffs make four arguments in requesting relief: (1) the appropriation was properly rescinded by majority vote at a special town…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Labor Relations Comm. v. Bd. of Selectmen of DracutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Wood v. Inhabitants of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Ogden v. Selectmen of FreetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Blomquist v. Town of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luchini v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Cronin v. Town of TewksburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Salem Sound Development Corp. v. City of SalemMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API