Legal Opinion
Saintelien v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 1, 2006No. 4D06-2792PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
937 So.2d 234 (2006)
Renoit SAINTELIEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-2792.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 1, 2006.
Renoit Saintelien, Okeechobee, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
2Per curiam
Renoit Saintelien appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Saintelien complains about his sexual predator designation because he alleges that his plea agreement did not call for him being designated a sexual predator. Because the sexual predator designation is not a sentence or punishment, see Walker v. State, 718 So.2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Kidd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Connor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Saintelien v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Boyer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Breitberg v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Breitberg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Breitberg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.